A technical feasibility study will provide detailed simulations, analysis, and recommendations regarding your future 5G NTN service’s potential strengths and weaknesses based on your specific combination of technology (NR, NB-IoT or eMTC) and the satellite-based network used for offering NTN services.
The feasibility study will be tailored to your specific challenges but will generally include system capacity calculations, performance trade-offs and suggestions on how to maximize performance under the chosen link/fading conditions and network configuration. Enhance the probability of a successful demonstration and commercialization of your future 5G NTN service by building your business case on a thorough technical feasibility analysis.
A technical feasibility study from Gatehouse Satcom will enable you to:
Firstly, we will need to know what technology you are targeting: NB-IoT, eMTC, New Radio or other?
Secondly, we will ask you to define your overall goal: Do you have a current system you want to analyze the achievable performance of? Or do you have a desired system performance you want to achieve?
Together we will formulate a line of questions you want to have answered through the feasibility study. The questions will guide the further process of defining what input we need from you, work packages and alignment of what output you can expect.
– Brian Pemberton, Chief Commercial Officer, Omnispace
This depends on the situation. First, there need to be feeder link switch-overs in place to secure connection to ground from any satellite. Secondly, the device may have to do cell-reselection if moving into coverage of another cell. If moving out of the tracking area, it will have to do tracking area update procedure (TAU). If a connection is established through one satellite, this connection can be kept even if the device is moving between tracking areas. It may involve a tracking area update of the device.
Depending on the orbit, configuration and antenna system this can be quite different. However 1-2 min of tracking with one CubeSat in LEO at 600km height is possible.
The first issue with being submerged in water is the additional propagation loss in the water: Water being conductive severely attenuates radio frequencies. So it would be key to stay at a low depth. Better link budget, ie. directional antennas and higher transmission powers, can help overcome this issue to some extend.
The second issue is refraction between the air-water mediums. Refraction happens when a wave travels through a medium of one density into another medium of a different density. This causes the path of the wave to bend and also slows down the speed of the wave which in turn decreases the wavelength, which an underwater receiver must also account for.
In short, the underwater scenario is very challenging and it would be advantageous to communicate at the surface.
Explore our articles, webinars and releases and let us show you how we and our clients are unlocking the power of satellite communications.
I look forward to discuss your current roadmap for 5G NTN and show how we can help you strengthen it.
Please reach out to me or fill out this form to start a conversation.